The Best of the Old and the New

President and Chief Executive Officer, IntraLinks
POSTED ON January 26, 2011

Andrew DamicoAs the end of January approaches, 2011 takes on a sharper focus. That said, 2010 is still a very clear memory. In many ways, it is the perfect time to look ahead to what I expect will be a great year while the recollection of our spectacular 2010 is still fresh.

If I had to pick one of the most memorable moments for IntraLinks in 2010, it would have to be August 5, the day we became a public company. After more than six months of preparation and a three week road show, our IPO was both exhilarating and exhausting. It was a proud moment to ring the opening bell on the NYSE and then watch the first 10,000 shares of IntraLinks stock trade. Our IPO has brought with it some new roles and responsibilities for me including media coverage and having to become familiar with getting makeup at 5 a.m. for TV interviews!

The positive momentum for IntraLinks has continued since the IPO, with eight financial analysts putting a buy rating on IntraLinks stock and a very successful secondary public offering within four months of the IPO. Both the IPO and secondary offerings have had very positive impacts on IntraLinks, including the significant reduction of our debt which will allow us to invest more of our cash flow into the further growth of the business. The IPO has also allowed us to offer our employees participation in IntraLinks ownership. I’m very pleased that we instituted an IntraLinks employee stock purchase plan; more than 70% of our employees have chosen to participate in this generous benefit. Employees can put aside up to 10% of their salary to purchase IntraLinks stock at a 15% discount four times a year.

Of course, there are many other accomplishments I’d like to reflect on beyond our new status as a public company. For example, I’m particularly excited about the revenue growth in our Enterprise principal market, especially our Life Sciences use types. As of the end of Q3 2010, we achieved 110% revenue growth in Life Sciences compared to the same period in 2009. Moreover, we signed a top 10 global pharmaceutical company to a $3mm a year, three-year deal for global safety reporting, which is the largest deal in the company’s history. The enhanced solutions we brought to the market in 2010 around our safety document distribution and study startup/study conduct use types puts us in a great position to continue to grow our Life Sciences business going forward.

Overall, we achieved record revenue and profitability as of the end of Q3 2010. Our strong results are a direct reflection of growth in our Enterprise principal market, and market share gains in our global M&A business. The growth in our South American business in 2010 is also noteworthy on the back of establishing an IntraLinks office in Sao Paulo, Brazil, and working closely with our partner of four years, Planet Associados. In 2010 we brought some new capabilities to our customers including dashboard reporting, document viewers that don’t require downloadable plugins, improved upload/download performance, support for seven languages and configurable workflow. These new capabilities have enabled our customers to gain additional value from the use of the IntraLinks platform. 

As for 2011, we’re determined to deliver value to all our new investors and I’m confident that we have a great strategy in place to make that happen. Much of our execution against our strategy will be a continuation of 2010, such as focusing on building further momentum in our Life Sciences business and taking additional M&A share from our competitors. We will continue to introduce new Enterprise use types including new horizontal solutions aimed at the needs of the General Counsel (GC) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO). Many GCs and CFOs are familiar with IntraLinks as a result of using our M&A use type. I’m excited to enable GCs and CFOs with IntraLinks solutions that allow them to address their everyday challenges when they need to exchange critical information outside the firewall in a secure, compliant and auditable manner.

In 2011, we will continue to drive our global growth outside of the U.S. Our long-term goal is to have half our revenue coming from outside non-U.S. geographies. We will sell our vertical and horizontal solutions to existing and new customers in geographies including South America, EMEA and APAC. We will make IntraLinks simpler, easier and faster to use by introducing new features like single sign-on for our Windows, SharePoint and Salesforce.com users. Additionally, we will introduce the second generation IntraLinks Courier offering targeted at ad-hoc managed file transfer and outside the firewall collaboration.

I’m excited about all our key initiatives and priorities for 2011 and am confident that by this time in 2012, IntraLinks will have another successful year to reflect on.

 
igwozfwge March 21, 2012 06:11 PM
dvIcYl , [url=http://ttrhejuftfxe.com/]ttrhejuftfxe[/url], [link=http://wpczynmhcnls.com/]wpczynmhcnls[/link], http://qhimfppwlvpx.com/
frhkysqnjs March 20, 2012 07:57 PM
IX1P66 <a href="http://gniivwwmosxo.com/">gniivwwmosxo</a>
veejay March 18, 2012 09:48 PM
The New York Times, July 18, 2011 Counterpoint: Debunking Myths About ChinaBy ERIC X. LISHANGHAI On these pages on July 1, two prominent China whctaers David Shambaugh () and Minxin Pei () analyzed the failures and challenges of the party as it faces a major leadership transition in 2012. Eric X. Li, a venture capitalist in Shanghai and a doctoral candidate at Fudan University s School of International Relations and Public Affairs, joins the debate.The Chinese Communist Party has been running the largest country in the world for 62 years. How has it done? We all know the facts: In 1949 when the Communist Party took over, China had been mired in civil wars and dismembered by foreign aggressions; its people had suffered widespread famine; average life-expectancy was a mere 41 years. Today, it is the second largest economy in the world, a great power with global influence, and its people live in increasing prosperity; average life expectancy has reached 74 years. But the assessment has to go deeper than that, for reasons none other than the apparent discomfort, if not outright disapproval, Western political and intellectual elites feel toward the Communist Party s leadership. Five misconceptions dominate the Western media s discourse on China. These misunderstandings need to be debunked by realities. China does not hold elections, therefore its rulers do not have the consent of the ruled. According to the Pew Research Center, the Chinese government enjoys popular support that is among the highest in the world. The Chinese people s satisfaction with the direction of their country was at 87 percent in 2010 and has been consistently above 80 percent in recent years. Sixty-six percent perceive progress in their lives in the last five years. A whopping 74 percent are optimistic about the next five years. We need to ask: How do most governments produced by elections compare with these numbers? Are elections the only viable way to validate consent and the legitimacy it brings? China is an authoritarian state in which the party s political power is concentrated and self-perpetuating. The Communist Party s Politburo, the highest ruling body, consists of 25 members. Currently, only seven of them come from any background of wealth or power, the so-called princelings. The rest of them, including the president and the prime minister, come from ordinary backgrounds with no special advantages. They worked and competed all the way to the top. In the larger Central Committee, those with privileged backgrounds are even scarcer. A visit to any top university campus in China would make it obvious to anyone that the Communist Party continues to attract the best and the brightest of the country s youth. In fact, China s Communist Party may be one of the most meritocratic and upwardly mobile major political organizations in the world far more meritocratic than the ruling elites of most Western countries and the vast majority of developing countries. What is wrong with self-perpetuation through merits? China s restriction on freedom of expression stifles innovation. China no doubt restricts freedom of expression, especially political speech. But does that impede innovation in Chinese society? Some of the most successful IPO s of Internet companies on the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq have been Chinese startups. Chinese businesses are well on their way to dominating the global alternative-energy industries. Breakthroughs in public policy have taken private home ownership from near zero in 1990 to at least 80 percent today among the world s highest, in this relatively still poor country. The Royal Society in London reports that China s share of scientific research papers published in recognized international journals went from 4.4 percent in the period between 1999-2003 to 10.2 percent in the period between 2004-2008, now just behind the United States. In 2008, China overtook France as the world s number three in contemporary art auction revenues. Fifteen out of 35 living artists worldwide who command seven-digit sales for their work are Chinese. If these facts do not demonstrate innovation, what does? The Communist Party s authoritarian rule leads to widespread corruption. No one, not least the party itself, disputes that corruption is a significant problem in China. But does authoritarian rule have anything to do with it? According to Transparency International, the top 20 cleanest (least corrupt) places worldwide include only four non-Western governments: Singapore, Hong Kong, Qatar and Japan three of the four are authoritarian regimes; the same three are the only ones that belong to the developing world. By Transparency International s account, China (78) ranks higher than India (87), Philippines (134), Indonesia (110), Argentina (105) and many more, and tied with Greece (78), barely below Italy (67) all electoral democracies. Apparently, China s one-party system is less corrupt than many democratic countries. China s success to date is all due to the party s embrace of capitalism and a market economy. According to the Heritage Foundation and The Wall Street Journal annual ranking of free economies, China ranks 135. Developing countries that rank above China (showing a stronger embrace of capitalism and a market economy) include Haiti, Algeria, Bangladesh, Ivory Coast, Pakistan, Indonesia, the Philippines, Kenya, Rwanda the list goes on. If market economic reform was the only magic China performed, how come many other countries that have implemented a market economy much earlier and deeper than China have not achieved much economic success? What else has China done? Hypotheses that do not stand up to facts and yet still dominate people s consciousness are specious and harmful. It is especially dangerous in this case because one cannot imagine a peaceful world order when the political and intellectual establishment of today s world powers holds views that are built on falsehoods.

Contact Sales

* = Required

By Phone

Americas:
1 866 INTRALINKS or +1 212 342 7684
Europe, Middle East & Africa:
+44 (0) 20 7549 5200
Asia Pacific:
+65 6232 2040
Latin America:
+55 11 4949 7700 or 0-800-892-2247